Book companion resource · One-Pager
Stage Failure Symptoms
Letter & A4. Print-ready. Free, no email required.
← Back to toolkit · Browse by chapterThe Five-Stage Cycle has five ways of breaking. Each shows up on the floor before it shows up on a dashboard. This is how to recognize which stage is leaking before the KPI report tells you something has already slipped.
Companion to: Fix the System, Chapter 3. Where to use it: tack this above your desk. Every Monday, read it. Decide which stage is currently leaking worst and spend ten minutes walking the floor against that stage's symptoms.
Stage 01 — IDENTIFY
Symptoms on the floor:
- Operators report issues verbally to a favorite tech ("I'll tell Mike")
- The CMMS backlog looks clean; the hallway backlog is full
- Walk-arounds produce lists that never become notifications
- Rejected notifications disappear without explanation — operators stop writing them
Symptoms in the data:
- Notifications per operator per month is low or trending down
- Triage time from notification creation to first disposition exceeds 48 hours
- The reject pile is not being reviewed monthly
Where the damage shows up downstream: Planning starves. The planner has nothing to plan against but breakdowns and regulatory PMs. Subtle early-warning signals never arrive.
Stage 02 — PLAN
Symptoms on the floor:
- Jobs show up on the floor without a BOM, a procedure, or an hours estimate
- The planner is in breakdown meetings all morning, not at the planning desk
- Technicians discover mid-job that parts are wrong, or the drawing is out of date
- Emergency work gets "planned" in thirty minutes on a Post-it
Symptoms in the data:
- Planned-work ratio below 75%
- Estimated vs. actual hours variance above 40%
- Planner-to-technician ratio is on paper, not in practice
Where the damage shows up downstream: Scheduling becomes a guess. Schedule compliance drops. Operations loses trust. The scheduler stops scheduling against the backlog and starts scheduling around it.
Stage 03 — SCHEDULE
Symptoms on the floor:
- The Monday schedule does not survive Tuesday
- Break-in work runs above 25% of the total
- Operators do not know when the crew is coming because nobody told them
- The weekly scheduling meeting is either not happening, or is ignored by production
Symptoms in the data:
- Schedule compliance below 75%
- Break-in work percent above 20%
- Frozen zone policy exists on paper but not in practice
Where the damage shows up downstream: Execution wrench time craters. Crews context-switch all day. Parts get robbed between jobs (which loops back and breaks planning).
Stage 04 — EXECUTE
Symptoms on the floor:
- Technicians walk to the wrong crib, wait for a shared tool, hunt for a puller
- Crews arrive at an asset before the operator is ready for them
- Vendor meetings and unscheduled tasks hijack leads mid-shift
- Wrench time is below 40% (measure it, don't estimate)
Symptoms in the data:
- Wrench time below Palmer's decent benchmark of 55%
- Parts-related delay percent above 15%
- Shared-tool delay showing up in technician interviews
Where the damage shows up downstream: Close-outs degrade. Technicians have nothing useful to say about jobs that did not go as planned. Scheduling confidence erodes. Planning feedback reflects wait time, not work time.
Stage 05 — CLOSE OUT AND LEARN
Symptoms on the floor:
- Close-out text reads "Repaired. RTO." and nothing else
- Failure codes are not captured, or are captured but never reviewed
- No monthly PM frequency adjustments based on close-out data
- Technicians say "why would I bother writing more? Nobody reads it."
Symptoms in the data:
- Close-out quality audits show <50% of jobs captured failure codes
- PM frequency changes per quarter: zero
- Repeat failures on the same asset with no RCA trigger
Where the damage shows up downstream: The loop is dead. The cycle becomes an open line. Every new turn starts at the operating point of the last — the plant holds or decays, but cannot improve.
Reading the chain backward
A diagnostic trick: the KPI that surfaces the problem is almost never the stage that produces it. Trace the symptom upstream.
| KPI that looks bad | Stage it looks like | Stage it usually IS |
|---|---|---|
| PM Compliance | Scheduling | Identification (kits raided for break-ins) |
| Reactive % | Execution | Close-out (no failure data driving PM adjustments) |
| Schedule Compliance | Scheduling | Planning (incomplete job plans) |
| Close-Out Quality | Close-out | Planning (vague plans produce vague closes) |
| Wrench Time | Execution | All four upstream stages |
The fix is almost always one stage upstream of where the metric lives.
The leakiest stage in most plants
Close-out. Always close-out.
Close-out is the feedback loop that turns the five stages into a cycle. Without it, the cycle is a straight line that cannot learn. Fixing close-out cascades forward into every other stage within a quarter. I have seen plants recover ten points of wrench time in ninety days by doing nothing but rebuilding their close-out rubric and auditing it weekly.
If you are not sure which stage to start with: start with close-out. Restore the loop. Everything else recovers faster with the loop running.
From Fix the System by Ivan Getov. Companion to Chapter 3: The Five-Stage Cycle. getov.xyz/toolkit/fix-the-system/ch03/stage-failure-symptoms. Free. No email required.