Plant Floor

Book companion resource · Rubric

Wrench-Time Self-Audit

Letter & A4. Print-ready. Free, no email required.

← Back to toolkit · Browse by chapter

The Chapter 1 follow-a-crew exercise, formalized for ongoing quarterly use. The number you track over time to prove the installation is working.

Companion to: Fix the System, Chapter 8. Prerequisite: read Chapter 1 (The Wednesday Crew That Did Nothing) and do the first follow-a-crew audit using that chapter's companion Field Audit Sheet. Who uses it: a designated observer. Usually the maintenance manager or a trusted supervisor. The same observer over time produces the most consistent series. Cadence: once per quarter per crew. Same day-of-week, same shift pattern if possible.


Why repeat the measurement

One wrench-time measurement gives you a baseline. Two measurements, three months apart, give you a trend. Four quarterly measurements give you a twelve-month arc of your installation.

You cannot manage what you do not measure. You cannot prove an installation worked without a number that moved. The quarterly wrench-time audit is the proof.


Audit protocol

Before the audit day

  • Pick a normal Wednesday (or whatever day is most representative — avoid shutdown days, start-up days, and audit-visit days).
  • Pick a crew. Rotate crews across quarters if you have more than one — get a read on the plant, not just one crew.
  • Tell the crew lead you are doing the audit. Be straight. Do not pretend.
  • Pull last audit's number for reference. Write it on your clipboard.

During the audit

Use the same time-stamped log method from the Chapter 1 Field Audit Sheet. Every activity change, a new row. Mark ✓ for "on asset" only when a crew member has hands physically on an asset doing maintenance work.

This worksheet focuses on the END-OF-DAY rubric — do the timestamped logging on the Chapter 1 field audit sheet, then bring your results here.

After the audit — rubric scoring

Beyond just the wrench-time percentage, score the crew on four execution-stage disciplines:


Rubric — Execution stage quality

Dimension 1 — Pre-Job Briefing

Observed: did the crew conduct a pre-job briefing at the asset before starting?

ScoreWhat you observed
3 — InstalledCrew lead ran a 4-item briefing (scope, lockout, assignment, questions) at the asset, taking 3-7 minutes.
2 — PartialBriefing happened but was rushed (<2 min), skipped one of the four items, or was conducted in the shop rather than at the asset.
1 — TheaterCrew "discussed the job" informally en route but no structured briefing occurred.
0 — AbsentNo briefing of any kind; crew arrived at asset and began work.

Your score: _____

Dimension 2 — Lockout Verification

Observed: for any lockout events, was the isolation verified (tested) beyond just hanging the lock?

ScoreWhat you observed
3 — Muscle memoryEvery lockout event was verified with a tested meter or an attempted start button, AND the verification was logged on the work order.
2 — Performed but not loggedVerification happened physically, but the log entry was missing or added later from memory.
1 — Lock hung, no verificationLock was hung per procedure, but no active verification was performed.
0 — No lockout requiredJob did not require lockout. Record separately — do not score on this dimension.

Your score: _____ (or N/A)

Dimension 3 — Live Data Capture

Observed: when did close-out data get recorded?

ScoreWhat you observed
3 — At the assetTechnician recorded parts consumed, failure codes, readings, and deviations directly on the asset-side tablet/form/clipboard during the work.
2 — At the job siteRecorded right after completing the work, but before leaving the job area.
1 — At the shopRecorded at end of shift from memory, at the shop computer.
0 — Not recordedClose-out was "Repaired. RTO." or equivalent empty text.

Your score: _____

Dimension 4 — Kit Integrity

Observed: did the crew arrive at an asset with a complete kit?

ScoreWhat you observed
3 — Complete kitAll parts, procedure, and safety items present and correct on arrival. No trips back.
2 — Kit complete after one adjustmentOne item had to be fetched or substituted; the rest was in place.
1 — Kit incompleteMultiple trips back to the crib or multiple substitutions required.
0 — No kitCrew arrived without a staged kit; parts were gathered during the job.

Your score: _____


Wrench-time calculation (summary)

From the field-audit timestamped log:

  • Total paid labor hours (crew × shift + OT): _______
  • Total on-asset hours (Σ minutes × mechanics ÷ 60 for rows marked ✓): _______
  • Wrench time %: (on-asset ÷ paid) × 100 = _______%

Your tier:

  • Below 35%: Tier 1 — trouble
  • 35-55%: Tier 2 — recovering
  • 55-65%: Tier 3 — decent
  • Above 65%: Tier 4 — world class

Quarterly trend

QuarterDateCrewWrench TimeBriefingLockoutLive DataKitNotes
Baseline
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4

What the scores tell you

If wrench time moved but the rubric dimensions didn't: measurement error, or a short-term adjustment that won't hold.

If rubric dimensions improved but wrench time didn't: the execution-stage installations are working, but an upstream stage (plan, schedule, identify) is still eating the gain. Go back to Chapters 5-7 and audit the upstream.

If both moved: the cycle is reintegrating. Expect the next quarter to move again. Keep going.

If neither moved: the installations are announced but not installed. Walk the floor.


From Fix the System by Ivan Getov. Companion to Chapter 8: Execute. getov.xyz/toolkit/fix-the-system/ch08/wrench-time-audit. Free. No email required.

↑ All Fix the System resources