Book companion resource · Worksheet
Inspection Route Audit Worksheet
Letter & A4. Print-ready. Free, no email required.
← Back to toolkit · Browse by chapterAudit active inspection routes, code missed work, and verify the findings pipeline before compliance numbers count.
Companion to: Fix the System, Chapter 20. Who uses it: the maintenance manager, reliability engineer, planner, and route owner. When to use: at the start of the Inspection Compliance Recovery playbook, then monthly until route compliance stabilizes.
Plant: _______________________ Date: _______________________ Reviewed by: _______________________
PART 1 — Route Validity Audit
Complete one row per active route. Answer all four validation questions. Any "No" means the route needs corrective action before its compliance numbers count.
| Route Name / ID | All Assets Active? | Frequency Appropriate? | Duration Accurate? | Findings → WO within 24h? | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No | ☐ Yes ☐ No |
Guidance:
- All Assets Active? — Cross-check every stop against CMMS active asset list. Any decommissioned or relocated asset is a guaranteed miss. Delete it from the route immediately.
- Frequency Appropriate? — Does the interval match the failure mode? Lube routes: weekly or monthly based on OEM. Vibration routes: monthly or bi-monthly. Visual rounds: daily to weekly. If unknown, default to OEM recommendation until condition data exists.
- Duration Accurate? — Compare logged completion times over last 8 weeks against the scheduled time block. If average actual time exceeds scheduled time by more than 10%, the route is overfull.
- Findings → WO within 24h? — Review last 10 findings from this route. Were WOs generated or no-action decisions documented within 24 hours? If not, the pipeline is broken.
PART 2 — Miss Coding Log (Last 8 Weeks)
Pull all flagged misses from the CMMS. Assign one primary code per miss. Tally codes at the bottom.
Codes:
- IA — Invalid asset (decommissioned, relocated, never commissioned)
- DF — Documentation failure (completed but not logged correctly)
- TN — Time not available (crew pulled, no coverage)
- FN — Finding logged, no action taken (route abandoned due to findings pipeline failure)
- DS — Deliberately skipped
| Date | Route | Miss Code | Notes / Context | Corrective Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Code Tally:
| Code | Count | % of Total Misses |
|---|---|---|
| IA — Invalid asset | ||
| DF — Documentation failure | ||
| TN — Time not available | ||
| FN — Finding no action | ||
| DS — Deliberately skipped | ||
| Total misses | 100% |
Interpretation:
- IA + DF together above 40%: Route management failure. Fix before any accountability conversation.
- TN above 25%: Resource coverage problem. Review labor plan and break-in frequency (see Ch18 Playbook 4).
- FN above 15%: Findings pipeline is broken. Technicians have learned that logging findings has no value.
- DS above 20%: Crew engagement or consequence gap. Investigate before attributing to supervision failure.
PART 3 — 90-Day Compliance Tracking
Track weekly route completion across all routes. One row per week. Calculate compliance at the bottom.
| Week | Routes Scheduled | Routes Completed | Misses | Primary Miss Code(s) | % Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | |||||
| Week 2 | |||||
| Week 3 | |||||
| Week 4 | |||||
| Week 5 | |||||
| Week 6 | |||||
| Week 7 | |||||
| Week 8 | |||||
| Week 9 | |||||
| Week 10 | |||||
| Week 11 | |||||
| Week 12 | |||||
| Week 13 |
Formula: % Compliance = Routes Completed ÷ Routes Scheduled × 100
Benchmarks:
- Below 80%: Program not delivering value. Audit routes immediately.
- 80–89%: Recovering. Identify remaining top miss codes and address in sequence.
- 90–94%: Top quartile. Focus on findings pipeline quality.
- 95%+: World-class. Maintain and audit route validity annually.
PART 4 — Findings Pipeline Audit
For each route, verify the findings pipeline is operational. Review last 10 findings per route.
| Route | Finding Date | Finding Description | WO Generated? | Days to WO / No-Action Decision | Action Taken |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No | |||||
| ☐ Yes ☐ No |
Findings Pipeline Summary:
- Total findings reviewed: _______
- WOs generated within 24h: _______ (___%)
- No-action documented within 24h: _______ (___%)
- No action, no documentation: _______ (___%) ← this number must be zero
If findings without documentation exceed 0%: Identify who owns the triage step and set a 24-hour response standard. Escalation path: planner reviews finding same day, routes to reliability engineer if no WO decision by end of shift.
From Fix the System by Ivan Getov. Companion to Chapter 20: Playbook 6 — Inspection Compliance Recovery. getov.xyz/toolkit/fix-the-system/ch20/inspection-route-audit. Free. No email required.